Agenda Item | Background Docs & Links | Owner | Notes / Actions / Next Steps |
1.9/K8s/Docs | | @Som Sikdar | Aug 28 Updates Som, Is 1.9 K8s compatible? Orchestrator is deployable, has helm charts AGW are deployable with caveats, unsure on helm charts Compatible is a bit "fluffy" Right now, using K8s is a project and not easy, using eBPF would be easy
Should we wait for eBPF? Jordan, two independent things, 1.9 and K8s can be done in parallel, my view make easy to deploy in K8s as soon as possible Lucas, does above include AGW? Jordan, yes. Jordan, Starter kit, will use docker-compose, we could also have on K8s Jordan, 1.8 is fully docker-compose for everything Som, what should the priority be for K8s compatibility long term? Jordan, if we achieve easy K8s deployment, big win Lucas, is there a higher strategic goal than 1.9 and K8s? Jordan, k8's is becoming primary way of orchestration, if we do not have full compliance/easy deployment of full magma suite we will be lagging behind everyone else. Should be a goal to have this as soon as possible
Lucas, do we hold on 1.9 for K8s support? Jordan, they can be de-coupled, they are fully independent Decision, creating separate stream for K8s support, workgroup potentially led by Jim and Jordan. Jim & Jordan will meet to discuss what this means prior to a formal commitment.
|
Updates on Release 1.9 | #15164: td-agent version pinning #15217: NMS yarn test (unit test) failing #15222: Summarizing the current state of CI Issues. Discuss DevOps workflows for patch-level semvers if we move from 1.9 to 1.9.0 label. Can we have smaller + more frequent releases?
| @Yogesh Pandey / @Tapas Mishra | Updates for 1.9 Aug 28 Updates Jordan - we as a community need to create written rule(s) on what versions we do and do not support. So that folks have predictability when there is a new release. Ben contract passed finance review, should be sent out early this week
|
OpenSSF Best Practices Badge | https://github.com/magma/security/issues/154 (was https://github.com/magma/magma/issues/15212) | Lucas Gonze | Aug 28 Updates |
Bug Bounty Program | | | Aug 28 Updates |
Proposal to move Magma to LF Connectivity | Request for comments on a proposal to move Magma to Linux Foundation for connectivity to facilitate more symbiotic community growth: Shared folder with proposal and FAQ (read-only) Doc to collect questions from community (read/write) magma-lfc - magma - Slack
| Som Sikdar | Aug 7 Updates Aug 28 Update |
Outreach Report | Outreach group met on August 17. Notes on update column to the right -> Upcoming town hall meeting planner - (Magma Townhall Planner - September, 2023 - Google Docs)
Secured Town Hall keynote speaker Magma @OSSEU Planner Sept 18th 1/2 day - Cancelled | Som Sikdar | Aug 28 Updates Action items:
(Som) write up the townhall planner in the proposed format
-- Outreach group proposes to TSC that the August townhall be postponed to September
-- This will allow more participation
-- We plan to talk about the Magma Starter kit and at least one user story from Wavelabs
(Som) Create a one-pager for items that will be a 'Magma Community Edition' starter kit
-- MagmaCommunityEdition - Starter Kit Overview - Google Docs
-- TSC, should we consider renaming v 1.9 to MCE 1.0? (Magma Community Edition v 1.0)
-- Pano - marketing support for previous releases? There were blog posts for 1.8, 1.7., 2.0 would deserve a press release and blog post. Som - starter kit would deserve a webinar, Pano - better to coincide with major version release. 1.9 blog update, 2.0 larger release (blog, pr, technical brief, webinar). Som 2.0 1-1.5 years away
-- Som - starter kit is an important piece that will help community adoption.
-- Aim to acheive consensus next week. (Som) check with LFC team for availability and support for the Townhall on 8/29
-- LFC team was available for 8/29. Shall check for Sept availability
|
K8s | General discussion on interest in eBPF project (migration from OVS) | @Pravin Shelar | Pravin → " Hello, I have created channel for eBPF and asked for adding developers that are interested in contributing, But I did not get any response yet. " #magma-ebpf Som → reach out for status update. Pravin - should we pursue? What resources can we get to work on this? Have not been responses in slack, hard to push forward Som - work with Ben on having a call to gauge interest. Suggest one more call for interest on slack, leave open for two weeks. Lucas - moves that EBF moves from TSC to workgroup discussion Jordan - agreed on above Ben - wait on removing until EBF meeting
Aug 28 Update |
Add architecture value to helm charts to support ARM deploy | This PR from jblakley is stuck in the queue and is quite useful:
https://github.com/magma/magma/pull/14863 | @Lucas Gonze | |
TSC Election | Special TSC Election For Max's Seat | Benjamin Sternthal | Aug 28 Updates |
Newcomer introductions | Max five minutes to learn about people who are new to the group | Lucas Gonze | Welcome! |
Reminder to Review Latest Q&A | | Benjamin Sternthal | |
User Story Ideas | | Pano | |
